Reflection
This project changed how I think about product design. Improving conversion wasn’t just about polishing individual screens—it required questioning underlying assumptions, understanding real constraints like compliance and data limitations, and reshaping the product around what actually mattered.
From collapsing a 30+ step setup into a single confirmation, to designing for messy real-world cases, to introducing back reporting as a growth lever, the work evolved from improving flows to defining how the product creates value over time. It pushed me to think beyond the happy path and consider how users experience the product across uncertainty, interruption, and long-term engagement.
It also reinforced that meaningful impact often comes from product decisions, not just interface improvements—whether that’s simplifying the system model, choosing when and where to surface value, or aligning user experience with business outcomes.
Looking ahead
Looking ahead, I see the next phase of this product in two parts: improving precision and improving flexibility. On the product side, there’s room to make bill detection and categorization more accurate, reducing the amount of manual intervention required from users. On the experience side, there’s an opportunity to make the value of reporting more legible by connecting reported payments more directly to visible credit-building progress.
For Back Reporting specifically, I’d be interested in exploring a more dynamic pricing model. Instead of a single flat fee, pricing could better reflect the amount of historical payment data available to report. This could create a stronger value-to-price fit, make the feature feel fairer across different user situations, and potentially increase adoption among users who may not be ready to pay the same amount for a smaller reporting opportunity.